Difference between revisions of "Talk:Voltolini - Superstarfish Dome 80"
From The Gemology Project
m (Talk:Superstarfish Dome 80 moved to Talk:Voltolini - Superstarfish Dome 80) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Superstarfish Dome 80 - Marco voltolini== | ==Superstarfish Dome 80 - Marco voltolini== | ||
− | + | [[Image:Superstarfish dome 80.JPG|thumb|right|350px|Citrine quartz, top view]] | |
+ | <br clear="left" /> | ||
+ | [[Image:Superstarfish dome 80 2.jpg|thumb|right|350px|Light peach/pink topaz, side view]] | ||
This is my favorite dome design (so far). It performs very well and the low angle of the apex facets permits not to have the "hole" you sometimes find in apex designs (check it with BOG or Gemray if you don't trust my picture below). If you want you can always add a tiny table, but here it is not needed in my opinion. | This is my favorite dome design (so far). It performs very well and the low angle of the apex facets permits not to have the "hole" you sometimes find in apex designs (check it with BOG or Gemray if you don't trust my picture below). If you want you can always add a tiny table, but here it is not needed in my opinion. | ||
I've cut it in quartz and topaz and I'm really happy with the results. Other people appreciated this design too. | I've cut it in quartz and topaz and I'm really happy with the results. Other people appreciated this design too. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |
Revision as of 04:56, 5 November 2009
Superstarfish Dome 80 - Marco voltolini
This is my favorite dome design (so far). It performs very well and the low angle of the apex facets permits not to have the "hole" you sometimes find in apex designs (check it with BOG or Gemray if you don't trust my picture below). If you want you can always add a tiny table, but here it is not needed in my opinion.
I've cut it in quartz and topaz and I'm really happy with the results. Other people appreciated this design too.