Difference between revisions of "Talk:Voltolini - No: it's trigonal"

From The Gemology Project
Jump to: navigation, search
m
 
Line 8: Line 8:
  
  
The overall aspect of the stone is quite strange: the reflections are more concentrated on three tips of the stone and the other thrre tips show broader reflections.
+
The overall aspect of the stone is quite strange: the reflections are more concentrated on three tips of the stone and the other three tips show broader reflections.
  
  
 
I test-cut this design in quartz (see picture on the right) and it is optimized for that RI. I have also cut it in YAG and it performs well also in that material.
 
I test-cut this design in quartz (see picture on the right) and it is optimized for that RI. I have also cut it in YAG and it performs well also in that material.

Latest revision as of 11:15, 13 December 2010

No: it's trigonal - Marco Voltolini

Light colored amethyst, 4.65 ct


This is not hexagonal: it's trigonal!


This is a simple cut featuring a common step-cut crown and a pavilion with steps arranged in a trigonal fashion, so the overall symmetry of the stone is three-fold. This feature is nice since the pavilion steps "bend" the steps of the crown to the viewer. This is somehow annoying when polishing the crown since some reflections simulate a misalignment and you may think about using the cheater to correct that. But it's only an optical effect...


The overall aspect of the stone is quite strange: the reflections are more concentrated on three tips of the stone and the other three tips show broader reflections.


I test-cut this design in quartz (see picture on the right) and it is optimized for that RI. I have also cut it in YAG and it performs well also in that material.